Gephi forums

@luizribeiro I'm not sure it's necessary to edit it now (though someone who knows better might correct me). I suspect there are opportunities for revision.

@taynaud @luizribeiro: I think the script API looks great, but I'd still like to push a little more for a DSL. I do agree that it would be nice to have a consistent set of APIs that would work in plain vanila Jython or JRuby or Groovy or whatever script language you'd choose. However, I do think tha...

Personally, I would be totally happy to do the port over a longer period of time. So using the GSOC'11 time-frame to get some initial porting done (maybe as you describe) and maybe start doing some re-architecting and better documentation as we go that could then lead to the upgrade at a later point.

Thanks for the continued interest in this. I guess I should have specified: I see no _theoretical_ reason why Gython could be integrated with MuTanT... :) In answer to how Gython/GUESS are implemented: 1) As far as I know, there is no way to "extend" Jython by writing a module or something like that...

MuTanT looks cool and it would be nice to switch between languages (I had a similar feature in GUESS that let you switch between Gython and R). I don't see any reason why Gython couldn't work under MuTanT. My experience with GUESS has been that people prefer a concise language for working with the g...